Complexity No Bar to AI

Re:Complexity No Bar to AI by delightful on Sunday February 21, 2021 @04:19PM (#26217308)

Please stop posting links to your papers all over the place not stating your the author and not explicitly embedding what you have to say in the comments themselves; as is, to me, you’re no better than a spammer.

In the comment above, you even copied and pasted it from your last comment and forgot to update the URL; that is, the URL above is from your prior comment which is formatted exactly the same way; stop spamming.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Complexity No Bar to AI by ProfHewitt on Tuesday February 23, 2021 @09:45AM (#26237849)

Deligtful: Have you actually read the article?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Complexity No Bar to AI by carapace on Sunday February 21, 2021 @05:09PM (#26217756)

You are replying to the famous computer scientist prof. Carl Hewitt. He doesn't have to state who he is because everybody already knows (except you, evidently.)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Hewitt

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Complexity No Bar to AI by heavyset_go on Sunday February 21, 2021 @05:45PM (#26218107)

It's pretty telling that some people respond with strong dismissals of an actual accomplished researcher in the field we're discussing versus the musings of some programmer who blogs.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Complexity No Bar to AI by shawnz on Sunday February 21, 2021 @06:20PM (#26218373)

Is it OK to post unsubstantive self-promotional comments as long as you're an accomplished researcher?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Complexity No Bar to AI by carapace on Monday February 22, 2021 @12:05AM (#26221063)

If you're Carl Hewitt, yes.

[ Parent | on HN ]