News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Activists who embrace nuclear power by sofixa on Sunday February 21, 2021 @03:13PM (#26216697)
> Cost is the impediment to nuclear, not any sort of safety concerns

That's not entirely true, and safety features and regulations are a major part of nuclear's cost.

> That molten salt reactor will need to have a negative cost in order to compete with the cost of stored renewable energy

Does stored renewable energy come for free? From what i recall, there's still no actual solution to that problem on a big scale.

Re:Activists who embrace nuclear power by Daho0n on Sunday February 21, 2021 @04:46PM (#26217565)
>safety features and regulations are a major part of nuclear's cost.

Which regulations -that aren't there for safety- are driving up cost of nuclear power? I can't find any. Are you saying we should cut down on safety to make nuclear able to compete?

Re:Activists who embrace nuclear power by vasama on Sunday February 21, 2021 @05:05PM (#26217718)
Making a molten salt reactor safe might be much cheaper than a light water reactor.
Re:Activists who embrace nuclear power by Paradigma11 on Monday February 22, 2021 @03:08AM (#26222009)
No, he is saying that MSR do not have many of those problems and are in compliance with those regulations without costly measures.