Re:Activists who embrace nuclear power
by blabitty on Sunday February 21, 2021 @01:39PM
(#26215907)
Forgive my nitpick but power generation doesn't generate electrons it pushes existing ones around, very slowly. Highly recommend http://amasci.com/miscon/whatis.html to anyone interested in discovering how inconsistently electrical concepts are defined and taught.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Activists who embrace nuclear power
by Ono-Sendai on Sunday February 21, 2021 @09:44PM
(#26220210)
I don't think you are correct.
For electricity to propagate at near light speed, electrons will have to move at near light speed, if only for a short time. Or to be a little more precise, shape changes in the electron wavefunction will need to propagate at near light speed.
I think we can do this to electrons because their mass is so low.
This only really applies when a circuit is opened or closed however. Once a circuit reaches a stable state (voltage is unchanged) the electrons don't move fast, I guess.
Re:Activists who embrace nuclear power
by StillBored on Monday February 22, 2021 @03:52PM
(#26230439)
No, he is correct, its the wave that propagates at a fraction of the speed of light (depending on the conductor). The electrons themselves don't move very fast.
"An electron travels at a speed of about 1 cm/sec. " (in copper) per: https://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=2916283&seq...
This should be taught in a basic AP physics class in HS (where i initially heard it). I vaguely remember doing some of these calculations in my physics for engineers class as a first year engineering student too.
Re:Activists who embrace nuclear power
by Ono-Sendai on Monday February 22, 2021 @06:52PM
(#26232223)
That article is probably wrong too.
A changed electric field requires a change in the position of electrons. Hence a fast signal change requires fast position changes.