News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:66% of all Tether (USDT) have been printed in the last 6 ... by pmayrgundter on Sunday February 21, 2021 @11:52AM (#26214940)
I don't know, but I think the destination is primarily the stock market for the past year. Maybe some also went to bitcoin.

- Fed open market operations: $2.8T introduced over 9 month by the Fed in 2020[1].

- Stock market (DJIA) run-up in 2020: $2.2T [2]

I don't think this can be just correlation, even on the simplest reading of how the Fed OMO works, but there is debate about this[3].

[1] https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/M1. I believe M1 money is a good proxy for the Fed's open market operations that would go towards the kind of asset purchases that would increase stock equity valuation. I'd appreciate any feedback on this

[2] DJI went from $22k on Mar 1 2020 -> $30k, for an $8k change by end of year. DJI had a market cap of $8.3T when it was at $29k Dec 2019[2.1], so 8/29=0.27. 27% of 8.3T = $2.2T.

[2.1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dow_Jones_Industrial_Average

[3] https://economics.stackexchange.com/questions/12226/does-the...

Re:66% of all Tether (USDT) have been printed in the last 6 ... by shuckles on Sunday February 21, 2021 @11:42PM (#26220937)
I'm having trouble following your logic for [2]. Prices are decided on the margin whereas M1 is a metric of total assets, which is a cumulative measure. As a thought exercise: if I owned the entirety of $DJI, and you bought $2.2T of $DJI from me, M1 would be unchanged (your money is now held in deposit at my bank account), and the market cap of $DJI would be determined entirely by our transaction price. By what mechanism do you relate the two?
Re:66% of all Tether (USDT) have been printed in the last 6 ... by pmayrgundter on Monday February 22, 2021 @12:13AM (#26221105)
I mean it in the usual supply/demand sense: more money => higher prices.[1].

The Fed OMO directly drives prices level/inflation. Look at the series below... the 10 year break even inflation rate[2] looks almost exactly like the stock market since the crash, but they weren't in sync before. Ofc, it's primarily being used to shore up the value of the 10-Year Treasury Constant Maturity Rate bond [3], which would otherwise look like [4]. But I think the money supply pressure effects both, and the relative quantities are on par, so seems like the pieces fit to me.

[1] https://www.investopedia.com/insights/what-is-the-quantity-t...

[2] 10-Year Breakeven Inflation Rate: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/T10YIE [3] 10-Year Treasury Inflation-Indexed Security, Constant Maturity: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DFII10 [4] 10-Year Treasury Constant Maturity Rate: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DGS10