Re:Activists who embrace nuclear power
by galangalalgol on Sunday February 21, 2021 @11:10AM
(#26214488)
A grid that relies on transmission to that degree will require unifying some disparate grids won't it? Also it seems horribly vulnerable to attacks digital or physical.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Activists who embrace nuclear power
by afterburner on Sunday February 21, 2021 @11:14AM
(#26214534)
If you're worried about attacks, you should be even more worried about nuclear.
Re:Activists who embrace nuclear power
by Enginerrrd on Sunday February 21, 2021 @11:33AM
(#26214747)
Not really. This is actually a primary design consideration taken very seriously at nuke plants. The same can NOT be said about the rest of the grid, and renewable generation facilities.
Re:Activists who embrace nuclear power
by afterburner on Sunday February 21, 2021 @12:00PM
(#26215031)
> This is actually a primary design consideration taken very seriously at nuke plants.
Yeah, because they're so dangerous.
If you're worried about the grid, you were always worried. We use a grid now, and in the past. Massive near-continent wide failures happened before major renewable use.
Re:Activists who embrace nuclear power
by galangalalgol on Sunday February 21, 2021 @11:53AM
(#26214955)
Protecting single facilities is very hard, protecting an entire grid seems impossible. Ild hope for a decentralized grid where every generator, user, and conveyer of electricity was assumed to potentially be a subverted actor. But that seems super hard.