> No need to invent whole new things or shift definitions just so you can complain about them.

Since I agree with you, I assume this is aimed at the comment I’m responding to it, and those like it, rather than me.

Not you. Just frustrated by the seeming religious fervor some Apple-haters have. Seems like sometimes people are willing to go through great contortions to figure out how whatever Apple did is wrong.

Totally understand why people might prefer Linux/ Windows/ Amiga/ whatever. People should just enjoy what they want.

> Just frustrated by the seeming religious fervor some Apple-haters have.

It goes both ways. I'd add that atleast the "Apple-haters" have more of a standing in defending open computing standards and demanding Apple be open too.

Dishonest redefinition doesn’t create standing.

Also - why does hating Apple give anyone any right to demand anything from them?

Why not demand more from people who are actually working on Open computing?

> more of a standing

So you think ignoring facts and making nonsense gives you credibility so long as you hate the right people?

Maybe in your own head.