News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uber drivers are workers not self employed, Supreme Court... by cloudfifty on Friday February 19, 2021 @09:46AM (#26193677)
No. Your premise seem to be that this anecdote is correct and that that is the inevitable result of non gig-job delivery. I'm pretty sure that there's a lot of anecdotes out there with bad Uber Eats deliveries too.
Re:Uber drivers are workers not self employed, Supreme Court... by sokoloff on Friday February 19, 2021 @10:11AM (#26193981)
I did (and do) not argue it’s inevitable, but it is quite common in my experience.

My solution to their failure is to go pick it up myself, including purchasing some of those red insulated delivery boxes for our family use. It makes takeout much more enjoyable when the timing is predictable and the food almost as high-quality as if served on-site.

As a customer, my concern is with a goods and services I’m buying. The restaurant’s relationship with its employees, food suppliers, and power company is their concern, not mine. If a restaurant wants to pay $100/hr or any other legal wage, that’s their business, not mine.

Re:Uber drivers are workers not self employed, Supreme Court... by cloudfifty on Friday February 19, 2021 @10:19AM (#26194066)
> is their concern, not mine.

Well. This is self-centered to me. I don't want to buy anything from anyone who doesn't treat people with dignity.

Re:Uber drivers are workers not self employed, Supreme Court... by sokoloff on Friday February 19, 2021 @10:22AM (#26194090)
It’s inarguably self-centered but entirely practical. I can’t review the employee handbook, employee promoter score, supply chain sustainability reports, and corporate social responsibility policies of everyone I order so much as an $8 pizza from.
Re:Uber drivers are workers not self employed, Supreme Court... by cloudfifty on Friday February 19, 2021 @10:37AM (#26194245)
There's nothing opaque about the labour relations of the gig-economy.