Re:Uber drivers are workers not self employed, Supreme Court...
by ivanbakel on Friday February 19, 2021 @08:37AM
(#26192979)
This is untrue. A few months ago there was an article on the front page about a restaurant serving pizza that had been auto-listed by, IIRC, Deliveroo - which had put a menu online with marked-up prices and was allowing users to place orders.
The restaurant owner even discovered that, because of some inconsistency between his prices and the third-party ones, he could cause the delivering company to pay him by simply placing orders to himself.
Re:Uber drivers are workers not self employed, Supreme Court...
by FireBeyond on Friday February 19, 2021 @01:49PM
(#26196471)
I had visions of doing fancy CSS too, to render an accurate menu to your website viewers, but that would be deceptive to Uber's scrapers to mess with their menu.
Re:Uber drivers are workers not self employed, Supreme Court...
by Hydraulix989 on Friday February 19, 2021 @06:30AM
(#26191979)
It's not always obvious to users that the restaurants listed on these apps are not the real restaurants themselves.
Re:Uber drivers are workers not self employed, Supreme Court...
by chrisseaton on Friday February 19, 2021 @06:44AM
(#26192082)
> the restaurants listed on these apps are not the real restaurants themselves
This isn't what is happening.
The food still comes from the actual restaurants.
Re:Uber drivers are workers not self employed, Supreme Court...
by throw_away892 on Friday February 19, 2021 @06:47AM
(#26192096)
True. But that was not my argument.
What you should feel bad about are the excessive commission fees charged by those delivery apps.