News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The frame rate of the universe (2009) by AnIdiotOnTheNet on Thursday February 18, 2021 @08:44PM (#26188465)
> Absolutely. If we are in a simulation, then I want our species to [...] bootstrap into becoming "real"

Why? Undoubtedly the world outside our own has its own problems, all of which are possibly utterly alien to us.

> or finding out how far the turtles go from the developer's world.

To what end? Why is the top-most reality more valuable? If it is merely a matter of having more to explore, well, there's still plenty of this universe left.

> If it is a simulation, then I want to alter the damn rules to eliminate the scarcity we currently labor under.

Fair enough, but if there's a way to do that it hardly matters if we're in a simulation or not. Any exploit we pull off may as well just be some quirk of physics from our perspective.

Re:The frame rate of the universe (2009) by yourapostasy on Saturday February 20, 2021 @06:42AM (#26203438)
> Why?

Selfishly, I don't want our reality to be turned off.

All other motivations follow from that, as intermediate steps to figure out how to break out and become more permanent. Even if I'm a consciousness inside a Boltzmann Brain near the heat death of the reality-actual, a hundred Sol years passing for every "second" of simulation "tick", I want help in whatever way I can on a solution to beat entropy. Not going gentle and all that...