Re:Vertical farming does not save space
by jobe_br on Thursday February 18, 2021 @08:29PM
(#26188347)
Nevermind that land used for energy often isn’t suitable for farming, so … even with the hypothesis, limited as it is, it’s flawed.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Vertical farming does not save space
by TheCoelacanth on Thursday February 18, 2021 @10:45PM
(#26189412)
Less suitable than empty air 10 feet above the ground?
How is vertical farming powered by solar panels better than building the same artificial growing environment at ground-level and powering it with sunlight?
Re:Vertical farming does not save space
by trickstra on Friday February 19, 2021 @12:14AM
(#26190018)
Because you can put the solar panels above a parking lot. You can't directly compare land area for growing with land area for solar panels, qualitatively, they are two very different lands. We have more of the latter.
Re:Vertical farming does not save space
by monkeycantype on Thursday February 18, 2021 @08:34PM
(#26188391)
Yes this could save a lot of arable or environmentally significant land, even if it didn't save a net m^2