Re:Judge: Citibank isn't entitled to $500M it sent to variou...
by FalconSensei on Thursday February 18, 2021 @02:51PM
(#26184566)
> For an unintentional payment, I agree. For an accidental overpayment,
From the article:
> The defendants noted that the amounts they received matched the amounts Revlon owed down to the penny, making it reasonable for them to assume it was an early repayment of the loan.
So they were safe to assume they just got paid early, at least in this case
Re:Judge: Citibank isn't entitled to $500M it sent to variou...
by kempbellt on Thursday February 18, 2021 @05:28PM
(#26186661)
Feels like a super odd edge-case where someone accidentally overpays a loan exactly in the amount that is due in total, but I agree. It's a fair assumption.
From the article:
> The defendants noted that the amounts they received matched the amounts Revlon owed down to the penny, making it reasonable for them to assume it was an early repayment of the loan.
So they were safe to assume they just got paid early, at least in this case