Re:Mitigating Memory Safety Issues in Open Source Software
by kbenson on Thursday February 18, 2021 @12:48PM
(#26183037)
> In the case of Rust, I am tired of people evangelizing it when it's plagued with issues that undermine its goals
Do you mind explaining what you mean here? You seem to be alluding to something different than an unstable toolchain which you mention after.
Rewriting the world in Rust or other "memory safe" languages is not going to be the silver bullet that is being claimed. In the case of Rust, I am tired of people evangelizing it when it's plagued with issues that undermine its goals and rewrites will bring about more nasty bugs. "Unsafe" code will still need to be written and not being able to use or have stable toolchains to work with is a non-starter for a lot of projects. Until all of these languages have set standards and stable toolchains, hopefully the Rust Foundation will push, these languages are a non-starter.