Judge: Citibank isn't entitled to $500M it sent to various creditors last August

Re:Judge: Citibank isn't entitled to $500M it sent to variou... by gmueckl on Thursday February 18, 2021 @12:38PM (#26182893)

I read this article a few hours ago and I could swear that it didn't mention the names of bank employees then. But I can't verify that anymore.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Judge: Citibank isn't entitled to $500M it sent to variou... by dEnigma on Thursday February 18, 2021 @05:53PM (#26186962)

Here is the earliest snapshot on the Internet Wayback Machine: https://web.archive.org/web/20210217190305/https://arstechni...

It does indeed mention the names, even in this version from yesterday.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Judge: Citibank isn't entitled to $500M it sent to variou... by gmueckl on Monday February 22, 2021 @08:00AM (#26223994)

This made me re-check the article. I am consistently getting served a redacted version of this article that does not contain names. The only way for me to see the version with names is through the wayback machine. This makes it look like there are different versions of this article for different regions.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Judge: Citibank isn't entitled to $500M it sent to variou... by dEnigma on Monday February 22, 2021 @08:21AM (#26224166)

Just checked and the names are now gone for me too. Seems like they removed them (again?)

[ Parent | on HN ]