Judge: Citibank isn't entitled to $500M it sent to various creditors last August

Re:Judge: Citibank isn't entitled to $500M it sent to variou... by redkoala on Thursday February 18, 2021 @11:03AM (#26181467)

Oracle Flexcube is a packaged banking product. While Citibank did make the choice to purchase the product, the UI design flaw is really inherent in the product itself.

https://www.oracle.com/industries/financial-services/banking...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Judge: Citibank isn't entitled to $500M it sent to variou... by bigpeopleareold on Thursday February 18, 2021 @11:38AM (#26181982)

If the numbers don't convince, maybe the cozy picture of the man who enjoys doing large corporate transactions will seal the deal!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Judge: Citibank isn't entitled to $500M it sent to variou... by freebee16 on Thursday February 18, 2021 @11:29AM (#26181849)

on the link they say "A rich and intuitive user experience that helps bankers enrich customer guidance, advice and product recommendations to customers".

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Judge: Citibank isn't entitled to $500M it sent to variou... by lostcolony on Thursday February 18, 2021 @11:34AM (#26181937)

And to be fair to Oracle, it might be, now. And Citi is just using a twenty+ year old version of it. Because Oracle charges more for upgrades than support.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Judge: Citibank isn't entitled to $500M it sent to variou... by 35fbe7d3d5b9 on Thursday February 18, 2021 @11:32AM (#26181889)

Is it? Or is it like most Oracle enterprise products (E-Business Suite, PeopleSoft, yadda yadda) – and the actual UX is bespoke constructed by an army of contractors across the world?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Judge: Citibank isn't entitled to $500M it sent to variou... by NearAP on Thursday February 18, 2021 @12:46PM (#26183006)

I personally know folks who work in Oracle Fusion Apps and they do the design for Fusion Apps (and not contractors)

[ Parent | on HN ]