News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Analysis: Texas power outage leaves officials working pol... by dragonwriter on Wednesday February 17, 2021 @07:28PM (#26173836)
> I couldn't believe the WSJ Editorial Board came out with an article saying otherwise. Wouldn't being blatantly factually incorrect about business analysis hurt their reputation among their target audience?

Who do you imagine the audience is for the editorial pages of the WSJ?

Even long before Murdoch took it over, that part of the paper has a very different reputation and appeal than the rest.

Re:Analysis: Texas power outage leaves officials working pol... by sp332 on Wednesday February 17, 2021 @07:39PM (#26173931)
Well it's not just a random "editorial", it's a position piece from the editors. That's why it makes the rest of the paper suspect.
Re:Analysis: Texas power outage leaves officials working pol... by SiempreViernes on Wednesday February 17, 2021 @08:06PM (#26174140)
The WSJ Editorial board was writing editorials outright denying climate change as late as 2016, so it's not like they have a strong track record to sully.