Re:What World War I Can Teach Us about Misjudging Tech and S...
by pjc50 on Wednesday February 17, 2021 @06:13PM
(#26173142)
The pig thing is absolutely ridiculous.
> A/B testing propaganda, so perhaps you can fool all of the people all of the time.
Dominic Cummings boasted about doing this for Brexit: it was where the "£350m for the NHS" slogan came from.
Re:What World War I Can Teach Us about Misjudging Tech and S...
by eric-hu on Thursday February 18, 2021 @05:50AM
(#26178334)
> The pig thing is absolutely ridiculous.
That was my first thought as well. My second thought was that the parent got it backwards; self spiced pork would sell like sliced bread.
Re:What World War I Can Teach Us about Misjudging Tech and S...
by Mordisquitos on Thursday February 18, 2021 @06:50AM
(#26178760)
I agree that I would also thoroughly enjoy self-spiced pork (hopefully the retrovirus also mutates pigs' TRPV1 protein to be the bird variant, which is unaffected by capsaicin)... but was it really the commenter who got it backwards? Or is it the hypothetical Islamist fundamentalist group who does, with their lack of understanding of consumer preferences causing them to not realise the paradoxical consequences of their action in this scenario?
Re:What World War I Can Teach Us about Misjudging Tech and S...
by eric-hu on Thursday February 18, 2021 @01:21PM
(#26183460)
Maybe they had it right all along and were engineering a delicious coronary bio-weapon.
Re:What World War I Can Teach Us about Misjudging Tech and S...
by germinalphrase on Wednesday February 17, 2021 @06:34PM
(#26173351)
It will begin by releasing the locked-in, eliding the server nerve. The justice department will adopt it as an alternative consequence for crimes. The memories of the murdered are extracted and the perpetrator forced to experience the pain, the fear, the twilighting faces of those loved and now lost. It becomes an awakening. By experiencing deprivation we become willing to sacrifice more to reduce the deprivations of others. A post scarcity society is within reach, but becomes fractured. What is the machine for? To impress empathy upon man and sustain an endless modesty? To subdue, to control and assure plenty for your few?
I don’t expect, yet also wouldn’t be surprised if, an Islamic fundamentalist group genetically modifies a pig-specific retrovirus so that any pig which catches it will start internally producing enough capsaicin that nobody will even want to eat pork.
I do expect software based attacks to achieve government goals.
I would be only a little surprised by private nukes or lunar mass drivers.
If mind-uploading becomes a thing, I expect totally novel forms of interrogation in addition to virtual hells (a la Surface Detail by Iain M Banks), and several other legal and political messes outside the scope of this thread.
3D printing, protein engineering, AI controlled mining robots, etc. will lead to synthetic von Neumann machines that radically transform industry, giving small states or mid-sized criminal gangs significant war-fighting capacity.
AI can out-strategise humans. Who trusts it, wins — unless the AI was made wrong, in which case who trusts the AI, loses. Nobody will know if the AI is right or not until too late.
A/B testing propaganda, so perhaps you can fool all of the people all of the time.
Most of these are better as Hollywood plots than as real concerns. Whatever does eventually happen will seem obvious after the event, but will seem like science fiction right up until that point.