Re:The Libet experiment doesn't disprove free will (2019)
by nathias on Tuesday February 16, 2021 @03:48AM
(#26152132)
contingency is necessary but not sufficient for free will, Conway's definition is philosophically weak as it equivocates 'choice' and therefore the whole issue. The definition of choice includes not only possible options but also a selection mechanism, where for particles/random there is no selection mechanism (contingency)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.