Re:Journalism, particularly at the highest level, is about r...
by aktenlage on Monday February 15, 2021 @03:08AM
(#26140309)
The solution (albeit not a perfect one) is to make the decision on funding independent from political parties. For example, have a comittee (or jury) that is recruited randomly from the general public and decides on the plan for next year's budget.
Re:Journalism, particularly at the highest level, is about r...
by CountDrewku on Tuesday February 16, 2021 @11:03AM
(#26155147)
Or you can just put your own money towards media outlets that you think are providing more truthful content. Why would I want to give my money to someone else to decide what they feel is objective news? No thanks.
What you want is control over what other people think.
Re:Journalism, particularly at the highest level, is about r...
by pelliphant on Monday February 15, 2021 @05:41AM
(#26141376)
I think the solutiion is that both are needed.
corporate funded news can investigate the government, and government funded news can investigate corporations.
Re:Journalism, particularly at the highest level, is about r...
by jay_kyburz on Monday February 15, 2021 @04:14PM
(#26147503)
We have government funded police and judiciary sending government officials to jail when they break the law, I think we could set up an independent journalism arm as well to publicly report what is going on in the halls of parliament.
This is especially the case when a proto-strongman is attempting to consolidate power.
Publicly funded journalism cannot be the only way it works.
(I say this as a left-learning person generally supportive of public funding).
(Also, "entertainment" vs "an essential service" is a false dichotomy)