why don’t you think those are mutually inclusive?

there exists retail [essential worker] jobs that don’t currently expose you to alot of people

and would fit the categorizations created by the state

the same goes for health care professionals or education workers

surprising to see how much the consensus here is grasping. newsflash remote tech workers, you dont have to keep the same job or only one job and your circumstance may not actually be privileged

> why don’t you think those are mutually inclusive?

Because the question is not “Which retail job can I get to help things going on, but doesn't actually increase my exposure possibility?”.

It seems to me the motivation is only getting the vaccine, OP doesn't mention the will/objective to help.

OP didn't say "I want to help retail, how do I do it without getting exposed ?” ?

His objective is to get bumped on the vaccine list by going retail with the least exposure. That's literally his statement.

"triggered" ? I would have used "confused" but that choice of words seals the deal for me. also newsflash omitting capital letters and final stop don't make you sound cool good luck

“confused” by my syntax too