Re:“Location-Based Pay” – Who are we to complain?
by riskable on Sunday February 14, 2021 @11:27AM
(#26133642)
Perhaps they thought the lack of memory management options in Go is anti-intellectual?
I'm not a huge fan of Go (more of a Python/Rust person--to promote my bias) but I can't think of how it would be "anti-intellectual" (either). The statement was way out of place.
Re:“Location-Based Pay” – Who are we to complain?
by Ericson2314 on Sunday February 14, 2021 @01:18PM
(#26134658)
Ignoring prior art, like generic types until 10 years later. Basically it's the evolution of java repeated; the second time is farce.
Meaning...?
I generally agree with your class argument but don't see how Go fits into it, nor what an "intellectual" language would be.