Re:Feeds Considered Harmful
by rektide on Friday February 12, 2021 @09:41PM
(#26120925)
warning: anecdotal. back when i wasn't banned on twitter, it was doing a good job surfacing outside, surprising content, seemingly without repetitous design. i got interesting tech tidbits from surprising places, regularly.
sugar is just one substance. i'm on mastodon & chilling elsewhere. these days there's a little less animosity & hostility in the algorithm vs timeline view, but for a while popular outrage against the algorithm was high. and i didn't buy in. i saw the algorithm as giving me good content, outside content, different things i wouldn't have seen.
i think there are dangerous avenues too. i'd like to know more about how many other people got recommended the "niche" "interesting" content i saw, get some idea how broadscale versus personal it was. but it was working for me. it wasn't an echo chamber. it was surfacing interesting tech topics.
sugar is just one substance. i'm on mastodon & chilling elsewhere. these days there's a little less animosity & hostility in the algorithm vs timeline view, but for a while popular outrage against the algorithm was high. and i didn't buy in. i saw the algorithm as giving me good content, outside content, different things i wouldn't have seen.
i think there are dangerous avenues too. i'd like to know more about how many other people got recommended the "niche" "interesting" content i saw, get some idea how broadscale versus personal it was. but it was working for me. it wasn't an echo chamber. it was surfacing interesting tech topics.