Re:It's time to port your extension to Firefox
by franga2000 on Saturday February 13, 2021 @02:54PM
(#26126206)
I think there's a big difference between commercial web browser extensions that are basically turning into what toolbars used to be and (usually) open-source extensions that really are what they say - something that extends what your browser can do.
A well-made extension these days with no ulterior motives will be scoped tightly to only the site it's designed for or not even that, if it only modifies the browser chrome. I have like 20-30 extensions currently installed on my workstation, but only three of them have global content access (uBlock, Bitwarden, Dark Reader - all FOSS). The rest are highly site-specific and don't even see any other sites, so I'm not too worried about them.
The only extensions I would need are for ad blocking, which is solved with a DNS blocker on my router, avoiding the need to set it up on all my devices separately, and a password manager, which I find I don't actually need since copy/pasting from a terminal with pass works well enough. So now all my browsers run as vanilla as possible, with maybe a built-in dark theme.
In this specific case Keysmith can record any input on any page and play it back. While the functionality is undoubtedly useful, the keylogger aspect sounds like a huge privacy risk. Their privacy policy[1] "promises" they will never collect or sell any sensitive data, but frankly why should I trust it or trust that it won't change without my knowledge? Especially with a proprietary app I can't inspect the source code of.
The Chrome Web Store submission process sounds like a nightmare, but I'm more concerned that such an invasive extension was ultimately allowed on both platforms, and that it was approved on Firefox in just 24h.
[1]: https://www.keysmith.app/privacy-policy