Re:Short fat engineers are undervalued
by keybored on Friday February 12, 2021 @06:31PM
(#26119835)
Fatness and lack of stature was the original topic.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Short fat engineers are undervalued
by smnrchrds on Friday February 12, 2021 @06:44PM
(#26119950)
But the comment you replied to talked about attractiveness in general.
Here’s the comment that that one was a reply to:
> I believe there is ample research showing height and attractiveness (one could reasonably consider weight to be one determining factor in attractiveness) do play a factor in career success, compensation, and selection for leadership.
Look, only about obesity and height (and mainly height). To which they replied:
> I think it goes more the other way around. …
Which makes no sense because no one ever mentioned hair, so that can’t be used as a direct counter-argument to a comment about research on height.
Are we gonna continue this? This is enough for me.
Re:Short fat engineers are undervalued
by smnrchrds on Friday February 12, 2021 @07:58PM
(#26120472)
I would write a rebuttal, but you have written it for me. "attractiveness (one could reasonably consider weight to be one determining factor in attractiveness)" does not mean "attractiveness (which means weight)".