Re:“I saw that you spun up an Ubuntu image in Azure”
by moron4hire on Friday February 12, 2021 @12:00PM
(#26115732)
You might not have expected it, but privacy protection is not any sort of obligation encoded in any extant concept of Free Software.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:“I saw that you spun up an Ubuntu image in Azure”
by wizzwizz4 on Saturday February 13, 2021 @06:45AM
(#26123036)
Free software is about user empowerment, and the ability for users to be hackers if they want to (or employ people to make changes on their behalf). “Sike, we've been stalking you and you can't do anything about it” is antithetical to this ideal.
Privacy protection is not an obligation, but transparency and openness is. Yes, you're not contractually required to not make a separate computer system that's proprietary and closed and disempowering, but that's so pedantic as to be malicious.
Re:“I saw that you spun up an Ubuntu image in Azure”
by gowld on Friday February 12, 2021 @12:47PM
(#26116333)
It has nothing to do with Free Software. I'd expect the same treatment if I were paying Microsoft to run Oracle for me.
Re:“I saw that you spun up an Ubuntu image in Azure”
by moron4hire on Friday February 12, 2021 @12:51PM
(#26116400)
So you didn't read the ToS, I take it? I did. I do whenever it's something important to the company's infrastructure. Canonical is the one at fault here for not adhering to Microsoft's guidelines. But Microsoft put the warning on the package.
I mean, it's kind of ridiculous to think that you could do anything in a cloud environment system and not have your actions tracked. Hell, with automated load balancing and load-based billing, that's literally what you're signing up for.