Re:WTF Python: Exploring and understanding Python through su...
by coldtea on Friday February 12, 2021 @08:15AM
(#26113267)
It doesn't have to be 100% for that to be right.
If we can achieve a N% risk-free Python (without sacrificing other useful features), and we only have a M% risk-free Python (where M < N, or even M << N), then what we have is inherently bad.
If we can achieve a N% risk-free Python (without sacrificing other useful features), and we only have a M% risk-free Python (where M < N, or even M << N), then what we have is inherently bad.