Comparison of Rust async and Linux thread context switch time and memory use

Re:Comparison of Rust async and Linux thread context switch ... by sambe on Friday February 12, 2021 @06:03AM (#26112375)

The way you have quoted this suggests it is being said by the author, whom you are disagreeing with. It's not: it's being said by someone else (in an issue filed against the repo), and the author also mostly disagrees.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Comparison of Rust async and Linux thread context switch ... by lxpz on Friday February 12, 2021 @07:31AM (#26112943)

Sorry, yes this is not from the mouth of the author, however he seemed to agree with the premise that async/await is unergonomical and that performance is its only reason to exist, which I am trying to dispute (at least in the context of how Rust does it, which is much better than the JS version for instance)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Comparison of Rust async and Linux thread context switch ... by Woung1938 on Friday February 12, 2021 @07:18AM (#26112858)

Indeed. I read it as something written by the author. Double-checking revealed it was written by spacejam that did post the same argumentation over and over here on HN.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Comparison of Rust async and Linux thread context switch ... by krenoten on Saturday February 13, 2021 @05:55AM (#26122841)

I haven't mentioned async Rust on HN since 2015.

[ Parent | on HN ]