Re:The Vaccine Had to Be Used. He Used It. He Was Fired
by pmiller2 on Thursday February 11, 2021 @06:46PM
(#26109095)
What makes you think that remunerative work is inherently valuable to anyone other than the person paying for that work? You, like I do, probably work largely in order to line the pockets of some already rich CEO. That doesn't mean what either of us does for a living is socially valuable. This seems more like vanity to me than editing Wikipedia or improving OSM.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Vaccine Had to Be Used. He Used It. He Was Fired
by nickff on Thursday February 11, 2021 @07:05PM
(#26109268)
I can’t speak to your work, but the reason I get paid is the same reason that my employer profits, and that is because the company provides consumer surplus to its customers.
I’ve occasionally edited Wikipedia, to correct grammatical or factual errors, but I don’t see it as having contributed much to the world.
Re:The Vaccine Had to Be Used. He Used It. He Was Fired
by amp180 on Friday February 12, 2021 @03:59AM
(#26111820)
Consumer surplus is not the only human good and infact discounts good done for humans who do not have money.
This not liking vanity thing is interesting but if you tie it to economics then anything that helps people that doesn't make money --things like free software and participating in charities-- could be considered 'vanity' too despite the good they can do.
I got similarly worked up over 'virtue signaling' and people only doing good things for personal prestige when I was an angsty teen but later realised it was better to believe that some people want to do good things sometimes because reasons.
Re:The Vaccine Had to Be Used. He Used It. He Was Fired
by nickff on Friday February 12, 2021 @12:41PM
(#26116262)
To be clear, I’m fine with people doing whatever they want; I just don’t want to encourage it when it’s selfish behavior. I am not telling you what to do, and if you’d like to pay Wikipedia editors, I won’t stop you.