A cryptocurrency that would ACTUALLY be used as a currency needs a resilient network. But if operating a node yields no financial incentive, how is that network supposed to be created?
If Nano becomes an established currency, then a grocery chain can just rely on the existing Nano nodes to process its transactions (which will still be free), they don't need to run their own node for it.
Cut out all of the alternative currency speculation and just let the technology do the work on people's money.
Why do we have to invent an all new currency for these technologies to use? There is no good reason, other than to make early adopters wealthy, which they would like very much.
What's stopping the US government from taking nano and creating a USD-backed version?
My wife lived in US for a while, she is now in EU. She still has some bank account there with a few thousand dollars on it. She can't transfer it to EU (some limitation of that account), she can only get cheques, or ask for some credit card. I told her to see how to purchase crypto with that card, and then transfer the money like that. It's fucking 2021, are you serious?????
So yeah, if you expect banks to come up with a system that can compete with current gen crypto, good luck to you.
I use a major US bank. They offer $0 wire transfers to EU accounts. Wire goes out same-day.
Would much rather do that than transfer to a crypto exchange, convert to crypto (with fee), send crypto (with fee), exchange crypto on the other end (with fee), and the transfer to other bank.
> Wire goes out same-day.
That it goes "out" the same day is pretty obvious. That it arrives 1 second later a bit less.