Re:Dyson air purifier outperformed by cheap DIY box fan filt...
by kelvie on Thursday February 11, 2021 @12:21PM
(#26104309)
Are they? We have a modern unit (with the 2 stage filter), adn they send a notification when you have to buy a new one, for $99 CAD
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Dyson air purifier outperformed by cheap DIY box fan filt...
by ortusdux on Thursday February 11, 2021 @12:40PM
(#26104610)
Wow, they have a payment plan for the filters.
Re:Dyson air purifier outperformed by cheap DIY box fan filt...
by detritus on Thursday February 11, 2021 @01:14PM
(#26105089)
The company famed for creating bagless vacuums added a 'bag' to a product that doesn't necessarily need it?
Dyson's stance on Brexit makes ever more sense... .
Re:Dyson air purifier outperformed by cheap DIY box fan filt...
by ashtonkem on Thursday February 11, 2021 @02:51PM
(#26106236)
Having just gone back to a bagged vacuum, I genuinely wonder why people ever accepted bag-less vacuums in the first place.
Aside from the “empty the canister out and watch all fine dust float back into my house” issue, vacuum bags function as one massive filter. It’s not physically possible to build a filter into a bag less vacuum that approaches the size or capability of the vacuum bag itself.
Re:Dyson air purifier outperformed by cheap DIY box fan filt...
by sitharus on Thursday February 11, 2021 @08:51PM
(#26109945)
Bags are a razors + blades model. The vacuum is $100 but the bags are $30 for 3 if you buy the branded bags. Plus the suction on a bagged vacuum measurably decreases before the bag is full.
These days I have a roomba and a Dyson cordless stick vacuum for occasional use.
Re:Dyson air purifier outperformed by cheap DIY box fan filt...
by cma on Thursday February 11, 2021 @05:28PM
(#26108259)
Bagless vacuums will typically have a pleated filter for the fine particles. Pleating expands the surface area.