News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why Wasn't Ruby 3 Faster?. Parent comment

Re:Why Wasn't Ruby 3 Faster? by ketamine__ on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @10:07PM (#26097811)
More hardware resources.

The example given was a Rails app. I don't think one process per core is common for Rails deployments but I'm not sure.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why Wasn't Ruby 3 Faster? by jashmatthews on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @10:42PM (#26098022)
Process per core with threading for parallel IO has been the default for almost a decade now.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why Wasn't Ruby 3 Faster? by ketamine__ on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @11:46PM (#26098343)
Default in what app servers?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why Wasn't Ruby 3 Faster? by jashmatthews on Thursday February 11, 2021 @01:52AM (#26098955)
Puma is part of the default Rails Gems and was first released all the way back in 2011.
[ Parent | on HN ]