News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Wasn't Ruby 3 Faster? by josephg on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @09:33PM (#26097570)
Eh - it was a failure of the (people, technology) tuple. Different choices by the engineers on the team could have fixed that problem. And different technology choices by the engineers behind ruby (/rails) could also have fixed the problem. (Eg async io, much larger thread pools, etc).

Everyone dropped the concurrency ball hoping that was someone else's problem. Its the dev team's fault because everything is ultimately the dev team's fault. But it would also be great if it was fixed in ruby + ruby's ecosystem.

Re:Why Wasn't Ruby 3 Faster? by Railsify on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @11:18PM (#26098211)
If something is a known-known, you have to take personal responsibility when you don't take that thing into account and get bit. It's not appropriate to even mention some person you have not met as part of the reason a demo failed. Personal accountability it key in this industry, do your due diligence and events like were described will not happen.
Re:Why Wasn't Ruby 3 Faster? by dwrowe on Thursday February 11, 2021 @08:37AM (#26101332)
Easier to blame the seemingly nameless technology and completely change the conversation by using some other stack entirely that accounted for your lack of due diligence.