Re:Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index
by UncleMeat on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @10:20PM
(#26097895)
Listen to yourself. Decoys? What percentage of people do you think won't go running away screaming when you tell them that this is how they should store their wealth? If I lose my bank password I can walk into a branch and talk to a human. No need for metal etchings and incantations.
Re:Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index
by sparkie on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @10:31PM
(#26097964)
Yeah, not everyone needs custody of their own money.
But those of us who do, can.
Under fiat, we can't.
Re:Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index
by UncleMeat on Thursday February 11, 2021 @08:51AM
(#26101478)
And that'd be fine if btc was a niche product for a few people who want this control but it also comes with extreme social costs in terms of emissions. The power use argument that advocates make is that it'll be fine once btc is used by literally everybody.
You can leave a small amount of coins in the wallet using the same seed phrase but with no passphrase as a decoy. This way, if somebody "stumbles upon" your seed phrase, they'll attempt to recover this small amount of money, and you can monitor using only the xpub to discover it has been compromised. You then have some time to move the other coins before anybody could potentially brute-force your passphrase (Since they need to compute PBKDF2 for each attempt).
You can reuse the same seed phrase for multiple wallets, using a different passphrase for each. There is no way for somebody to determine if you have surrendered all passphrases for a give seed, since there could be infinitely many. This offers plausible deniability in the case your thief is the government.