News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index by wpietri on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @07:51PM (#26096888)
I think you're confusing cause and effect. People value stability, so more money goes into those things. E.g., SPY is an synthetic asset engineered to be lower vol.

I don't think it's at all clear that Bitcoin adoption will go up. It's never been useful as a currency for most people, and Tesla aside, merchant adoption has been in retreat for years. KYC/AML laws are reducing its utility for financial crime. Its only real advantage is in speculation and market manipulation. But both of those depend on volatility.

Re:Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index by hntrader on Thursday February 11, 2021 @02:24AM (#26099120)
I'm not confusing cause and effect.

Large cap stocks weren't engineered for stability, but they're lower tail-risk than mid cap stocks, which are lower tail-risk than small cap stocks, and so on.

The same phenomenon has been broadly true across all markets over all of human history, and the underlying mechanism (heterogeneous flows) is well understood and rather intuitive.

Whether or not BTC adoption increases is not relevant to what I was saying. My only claim is that volatility will decrease if adoption increases, counter to the misplaced scepticism of the post I was replying to

If BTC adoption decreases instead, then volatility should increase, ceteris paribus.