Re:Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index
by panarky on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @01:41PM
(#26093096)
That's always the problem with freedom, it works for good guys and bad guys alike.
Re:Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index
by toyg on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @12:12PM
(#26091903)
Let's not forget druglords, illegal arms dealers, hitmen...
Re:Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index
by meowkit on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @12:24PM
(#26092054)
Paging argument from 2010...
You would use Monero or physical cash for those activities.
Bitcoin is much easier to trace once you have a lead.
Re:Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index
by toyg on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @04:58PM
(#26095359)
It's just a tradeoff between opsec and ease of use. Monero is harder to turn back into cash, precisely because it carries a worse reputation.
Note that my argument was pro btc - I can see underground demand sustaining its price in the long run.
Re:Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index
by Solvitieg on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @12:31PM
(#26092166)
Because you definitely can't do that with fiat...
This is such an old, tired take.
Re:Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index
by bayesian_horse on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @12:59PM
(#26092563)
No, you really can't do that easily and sometimes at all with "fiat". Which is why "money laundering" is a thing. Or drug cartels having the problem to stash or move hundreds of thousands of small dollar bills over North and South American borders.
A somewhat trustworthy state having control over or transparency into money transfers generally is a very good thing. If your government isn't trustworthy enough, you have bigger problems than the currency.
And conversely too! letting corrupt governments and corporations transfer money with ease!