Federal laws should be simple and straight forward enough that most people agree with them. The only way to achieve that is to have some accountability to those people.
And that seems obvious enough that it really does just sound like you're wanting deregulation.
And if not, then it sounds like you want to have your cake and eat it too.
This is not true, most people don't really care. They might have a team they root for, but even those seemingly braindead people that are posting on the internet towing their party line are just looking for a way to fit in. They are all capable of thinking for themselves, and most of them will have a reasonable conversation with you if you run into them in the real world.
Seriously all I am saying is that regulation should be slow to change, and be approved by elected officials. I also think there should be way more congressional districts, and senators. Currently there is way too small of a sample size to be representative of the population. Basically I'm in favor of more democracy not less. Honestly if it wasn't such a waste of time I would be ok with replacing congress with open voting on every issue.
I think the burden of proof is on you to show why you think congress is capable of oversight.
Selection bias, etc, but when I reflect on this I can think (and quickly find) dozens of instances, large and small, where congress has demonstrated "oversight incompetence".
Congress can always override the agency if needed. If you think congress is incapable of oversight then you are just for complete deregulation.