Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index

Re:Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index by samuel on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @09:38AM (#26089675)

It's completely meaningless because GWh aren't interchangeable. A hydro o thermal energy source too far from inhabited places could be used for bitcoin mining and its CO2 footprint would be near zero.

I'm not saying you are wrong but this requires a far more exhaustive analysis.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index by lucb1e on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @07:33PM (#26096763)

There are transmission losses, but they're not that great.

Please point out which power plants were built especially for proof of work mining. The others were apparently built with something else in mind and their power is now being wasted on western people's get-rich-quick schemes.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index by jf22 on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @11:04AM (#26090954)

So we'd build energy production away from where people live just to mine a digital currency?

[ Parent | on HN ]