I'm not going to try to answer the first, but as to the second question: Britain is exactly the example of this. The Queen (or King) is a symbol of national pride and unity. The British people regularly give her an approval rating of over 90%[1], which is astounding for someone who lives off of the public welfare.

I happen to agree with the GP that monarchies should be abolished outright, but it is clear that people feel strongly and build identities around ceremonial roles.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personality_and_image_of_Eliza...

> someone who lives off of the public welfare

It isn't welfare if the person works in an official capacity.

Given that the article claims she had reviewed more than 1000 laws, it’s hardly fair to call it public welfare.

My reading of the article is that it's supposed to be a reveal of something that most of the British public aren't aware of. Given that they aren't aware of it, it's probably safe to say that it doesn't factor into their estimation of her. In other words, she might as well have not reviewed more than 1000 laws, as far as the factors that go into her approval are concerned.

Sure - but the point is she does a lot of work.