Haskell: The Bad Parts, part 2 (2020)

Re:Haskell: The Bad Parts, part 2 (2020) by Kototama on Tuesday February 09, 2021 @06:55PM (#26084171)

PureScript would almost fit :-). It would just need a modern Haskell backend but having a strict language built on a lazy-one is probably not the best idea :-).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Haskell: The Bad Parts, part 2 (2020) by YawningAngel on Tuesday February 09, 2021 @07:09PM (#26084284)

You can avoid lazy behaviour entirely in Haskell if you want to, so your purescript to haskell compiler can just only generate contrived haskell code that doesn't exhibit laziness

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Haskell: The Bad Parts, part 2 (2020) by cies on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @03:33AM (#26086803)

Idris maybe? If Idris has easy interop with the Rust ecosystem, we'd have a great backend (and with wasmer possibly also fontend) option.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Haskell: The Bad Parts, part 2 (2020) by Kototama on Thursday February 11, 2021 @06:06AM (#26100277)

I was also thinking as Rust as a backend for a FP language in the last day. I found some Ocaml binding for Rust. It would be interesting to see how it fits.

[ Parent | on HN ]