You don't see why making such a pull request would be inappropriate? Do you understand what pull requests are for?

Does this look like an attempt at productive contribution to you? https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-TLS-Proxy/pull/15

Is this a good patch? It just drops a random file into the repo. https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-TLS-Proxy/commit/40f4d9d...

These people decided to abuse the pull request system after being asked to use https://community.signalusers.org/ instead of GH issues to discuss their concerns.

This has nothing to do with my post.

Of course it does, unless you were replying to the wrong comment in the first place.

What was it you did not see any evidence of?

I think that it was you who replied to the wrong comment. I did not see any evidence of them talking about any inappropriate behavior of their own nor did I see them saying anything inappropriate in the quote that you posted.

You have a weird definition of "inappropriate".

You have to be pretty thick if you can’t understand how those pull requests were inappropriate.

You have to be pretty thick if you can’t understand what my post was about.

>2021-02-06 12:00 @DuckSoft sended a pull request that adds the PoC to Signal TLS proxy's repository.

This is inappropriate. Pulling in a random PoC to the repo is not how you’re supposed to use PRs. Issues exist for this purpose, but theirs had already been removed.

>It has since been deleted [...] A repost by @U-v-U was later closed and locked.

Reposting the inappropriate PR is also inappropriate.

I do not find either of these to be inappropriate.

They are, along with all of the misbehaviour this group is perpetrating. Acting in this way well result in nothing but derision and bans from any organisation (and prospective employer, for that matter) because it is childish and unproductive.

How is reposting content that was previously removed by maintainers not inappropriate? Signal made it very clear that this stuff should be posted on their community forums, not github.