News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tesla buys $1.5B in Bitcoin, may accept it as payment in ... by logifail on Tuesday February 09, 2021 @01:24AM (#26074500)
My wife is a microbiologist and works in $bigPharma. The latest joke her colleagues seem to be throwing around is the statement: "data is over-rated".

Joking aside, are we really seeing a data-driven approach to dealing with Covid19?

(Un)fortunately we still have our elected politicians holding the levers of power, and they have a habit of wanting to manage the narrative.

> Pregnant parents this year are going to have to go unprotected

I can't quickly find the appropriate data, but would imagine it's worth looking at the pre-Covid19 risk of dying in pregnancy vs dying as a result of Covid19 for an otherwise healthy woman in her 30s.

Data on leading causes of death by age group can be pretty eye-opening, I'd recommend everyone take a look.[0]

When and where on the charts do we think Covid19 is going to end up placing once the 2020/21 data is available?

[0] https://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/LeadingCauses.html

Re:Tesla buys $1.5B in Bitcoin, may accept it as payment in ... by dragontamer on Tuesday February 09, 2021 @01:31AM (#26074549)
> I can't quickly find the appropriate data, but would imagine it's worth looking at the pre-Covid19 risk of dying in pregnancy vs dying as a result of Covid19 for an otherwise healthy woman in her 30s.

1. Dying in pregnancy WITH COVID19 because you can't breath seems like a higher-risk situation.

2. Reducing oxygen levels is likely bad for the baby.

> Joking aside, are we really seeing a data-driven approach to dealing with Covid19?

We can't afford a data-driven approach. It takes months to answer questions with a study. We still don't technically know if vaccines prevent the spread of COVID19 for instance (even though its widely assumed).

I don't see any evidence that contradicts the assumed vaccine protection (vaccines protect us from other diseases). So why not assume until data proves otherwise?