News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tusk – Short-lived anonymous feedback by saimiam on Monday February 08, 2021 @03:07AM (#26061920)
Well behaved crawlers don't.

Products like Google Search and Bing have a self-interest in supporting robots.txt because the alternative is annoyed webmasters suing them for not providing an opt-out due to which their unsecured credentials are a quick search away.

In fact, I believe the robots.txt protocol was devised in consultation with search engines.

Re:Tusk – Short-lived anonymous feedback by mrkramer on Monday February 08, 2021 @05:28AM (#26062815)
A lot of webmasters are amateurs who expose their credentials even when robot rules are respected. Google dorking is a way to find that credentials and other sensitive data and information.
Re:Tusk – Short-lived anonymous feedback by mxxx on Monday February 08, 2021 @06:28AM (#26063192)
Unless I’m mistaken, google don’t actually respect robots.txt any more. They recommend the use of some meta tag instead, from memory.
Re:Tusk – Short-lived anonymous feedback by yarcob on Monday February 08, 2021 @09:09AM (#26064634)
Their docs say they do: https://developers.google.com/search/reference/robots_txt

They do say that they ignore robots.txt for user-initiated actions eg. Google Translate, which makes sense in my opinion.

Re:Tusk – Short-lived anonymous feedback by mxxx on Monday February 08, 2021 @03:14PM (#26069522)
Ah yes you’re right, my apologies. They don’t support the noindex directive inside a robots.txt any more.