Re:NRA bankruptcy lets critics peer into gun lobby’s inner w...
by Anon1096 on Sunday February 07, 2021 @04:21PM
(#26058298)
You can just read the page linked in the GP about gun spending. It's exceedingly obvious that they have a strong viewpoint on the issue.
Re:NRA bankruptcy lets critics peer into gun lobby’s inner w...
by woodruffw on Sunday February 07, 2021 @04:32PM
(#26058382)
"They have a strong viewpoint" is a not the same thing as "obviously biased." Conflating them is a rhetorical sleight of hand.
When I go to that page, I get a few grafs on recent mass shootings (which, barring conspiracy theories, everybody is presumably on board with having happened). Mentioning those at all indicates that they have a viewpoint, but I don't see anything that indicates that it biases their transparency work. There's nothing to justify the insinuation.
Do you have a source for this claim? They're listed as a nonpartisan organization online[1], and it seems as though their founders were a pair of Democratic and Republican senators. Their current lead project appears to be tracing the Biden administration's money, which doesn't feel like towing the line to me.
Edit: I found this conservative source[2], which refers to them as performing "left-wing" campaign finance advocacy. I think they're referring to the Citizens United decision, which has been a rallying point for every government watchdog that I know of. It occurs to me that (1) you could label just about anything as "left-wing" in this manner, and (2) campaign finance reform isn't something that most self-identified leftists would consider "left-wing" (being firmly in the "make government more transparent" category of political activity).
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_for_Responsive_Politics
[2]: https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/center-for-respons...