Re:Tesla: Recalled touchscreens were meant to only last 5-6 ...
by userbinator on Saturday February 06, 2021 @06:30PM
(#26051150)
The fact that newer cars are more complex and seemingly expected to have a shorter life has lead to an odd situation where parts availability and price may actually be far better for older cars than newer ones, especially due to the aftermarket.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Tesla: Recalled touchscreens were meant to only last 5-6 ...
by moocow01 on Saturday February 06, 2021 @08:24PM
(#26051779)
Is this true? From my memory, many car brands were only good for 100-150k miles when I was a kid. Now it seems like just about all cars made in the last decade are expected to be viable to 200-300k miles
Re:Tesla: Recalled touchscreens were meant to only last 5-6 ...
by blacklion on Sunday February 07, 2021 @11:00AM
(#26055838)
It is funny, how here in Russia there are a lot of talks that modern engines need rebuild after 100K-150K of KILOMETER (not miles), we could not buy car with "million-worth" engine anymore!
It is very common view, that modern cars are much more safe, comfortable, ecologically sane, faster, and even reliable in first 1-2 years, than old ones, but they will break up and require very expensive repair (engine re-sleeving or re-boring with full rebuild) much, much sooner than older ones.
Re:Tesla: Recalled touchscreens were meant to only last 5-6 ...
by fomine3 on Sunday February 07, 2021 @10:50PM
(#26060567)
Possibly social pressure for environment (fuel efficiency, exhaust regulation) affects the reliability. For example, some cars now uses 0W-8 oil.
Re:Tesla: Recalled touchscreens were meant to only last 5-6 ...
by blacklion on Wednesday February 10, 2021 @11:34AM
(#26091343)
Yep, it is understandable.
What is interesting to me, that USA users write about new cars that they expect 150K+ miles from them and it was not so in the past. Completely opposite to what users think here.