News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Cambridge Analytica psychologist advising Covid19 disinfo... by chii on Saturday February 06, 2021 @06:19AM (#26045819)
> There is a big difference between legitimate arguments about the risks involved in lockdown vs not locking down and entirely false claims

may be they are suffering from cognitive dissonance, and this is how they resolve their internal conflict - that it must be a hoax and covid false, because the lockdown is so much worse for them.

Re:Cambridge Analytica psychologist advising Covid19 disinfo... by heavenlyblue on Saturday February 06, 2021 @07:18AM (#26046058)
People believe in what it’s more comfortable to believe in. COVID being a hoax means that lockdown is unjustified and that also means all of their issues would go away: no sitting at home, going back to work.

It’s not about internal conflict, it’s about a pipe dream where it all goes away.

And on a practical level I would think many people would prefer a double-digit probability of dying from COVID while working rather than a few years spent in financial limbo due to lockdowns. So at this point COVID being a hoax becomes way less black-and-white: maybe it being a hoax is just a way to say that “I would rather take the risk, and the hoax here is that you are vastly overestimating the fear of death in population”

PS: I am not saying it’s a hoax, I am giving a reasonably plausible pattern of thought behind the mechanism justifying it being a hoax.

Re:Cambridge Analytica psychologist advising Covid19 disinfo... by pjc50 on Saturday February 06, 2021 @07:13AM (#26046032)
That does not entitle them to lie to us without consequense.
Re:Cambridge Analytica psychologist advising Covid19 disinfo... by herewegoagain2 on Saturday February 06, 2021 @12:57PM (#26048362)
Why not simply provide data to counter their "lies"? What makes you so sure to be in possession of the truth? Have you verified yourself, or have you simply chosen to trust the authorities?