News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:This Guy Has My MacBook by raganwald on Tuesday May 31, 2011 @04:43PM (#2604463)
This is fine line or argument, but don't you think it belongs in a courtroom, being made to a jury that has been shown all of the evidence and who will also hear the accused make his own arguments for his innocence?
Re:This Guy Has My MacBook by dhh on Tuesday May 31, 2011 @06:39PM (#2604983)
This is a modern day wanted poster. I think it's completely fine. He hasn't been convicted to any material degree: He's still free, unhurt, and in possession of the item.
Re:This Guy Has My MacBook by dtegart on Tuesday May 31, 2011 @05:17PM (#2604644)
The website appears to have been created in response to the inability of the police to bring the person, allegedly responsible, into a courtroom to explain why he is in possession of a stolen laptop.
Re:This Guy Has My MacBook by rosser on Tuesday May 31, 2011 @05:30PM (#2604712)
Isn't possession of stolen property prima facie proof of guilt of ... possession of stolen property?
Re:This Guy Has My MacBook by Periodic on Tuesday May 31, 2011 @09:19PM (#2605453)
Is buying stolen property, which you seller does not tell you is stolen, over Craig's List equivalent to stealing the item? Should the buyer be jailed?
Re:This Guy Has My MacBook by by on Wednesday June 01, 2011 @07:49AM (#2606854)
No. The police possess a great deal of stolen property. The entire police force would collapse into a blue hole if they had to arrest everybody in possession of stolen property. The crime is knowing it is stolen and having no intent to return it.
Re:This Guy Has My MacBook by djackson on Tuesday May 31, 2011 @06:24PM (#2604927)
Yeah.. that was pretty much what I was going for, there.
Re:This Guy Has My MacBook by wnoise on Tuesday May 31, 2011 @05:21PM (#2604663)
That's definitely required before bringing the resources of the state to bear in punishing the person.

If you're not doing that, then no, it needn't be.