Re:Program teaches prisoners coding so they can land tech jo...
by pmiller2 on Friday February 05, 2021 @06:22PM
(#26042481)
It's more like no politician wants to be seen as "soft on crime," and this carries over to "soft on criminals." Doing anything to help people in prison once they get out is politically risky in a lot of places. Just look at the number of states where it's still legal to ask if someone has a criminal record on a job application. This not wanting to be "soft on crime" is particularly pathological in jurisdictions where judges are elected.
Re:Program teaches prisoners coding so they can land tech jo...
by ryandrake on Saturday February 06, 2021 @02:03AM
(#26044735)
I recall being asked on a job application whether I was ever arrested, regardless of conviction. In some places, mere involvement with law enforcement is taboo.
Re:Program teaches prisoners coding so they can land tech jo...
by jonsen on Saturday February 06, 2021 @05:57AM
(#26045734)
Would it be possible to verify if you lied answering that question?
Re:Program teaches prisoners coding so they can land tech jo...
by jandrese on Monday February 08, 2021 @01:30PM
(#26068220)
Maybe not right away, but 5 years down the road when you're in an ugly power struggle with some other jerk for a middle management position HR might get an anonymous tip about how you lied on your resume.
Re:Program teaches prisoners coding so they can land tech jo...
by cema on Saturday February 06, 2021 @06:05AM
(#26045771)
Possible but costly. The US lacks a single information system regarding criminal history. There are private investigators, other private companies in the business of "record retrieval", but the results are not 100% accurate.
Who? Twitter idiots?
If you're going to take the weakest of strawman arguments for the opposing side, you're not going to get very far in your thinking.
There are plenty of ideas that aren't politically risky that don't get implemented, that would positively affect criminals and non-criminals alike - what's your explanation of such phenomena?
Blaming voters for the deeds of politicians has got to be one of the weakest strawmans I've heard in a while. It is the job of the politicians, domain experts and the media to present viable options for the populace to choose from. If the option chosen is shit, it isn't the person working 9-5 and raising a family that was asked to choose who is at fault, I hope that much is obvious.