Google’s approach to replacing the cookie is drawing antitrust scrutiny

Re:Google’s approach to replacing the cookie is drawing anti... by MaxBarraclough on Wednesday February 03, 2021 @05:48PM (#26020262)

I'm reminded of a snarky libertarian quip:

> If a big company charges more than the competition, they say they're illegally abusing their monopoly.

> If a big company charges the same as the competition, they say it's illegal collusion.

> If a big company charges less than the competition, they say it's illegal price-dumping.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google’s approach to replacing the cookie is drawing anti... by kevingadd on Wednesday February 03, 2021 @05:57PM (#26020335)

This seems like it overlooks the obvious possibility of things that don't fall into any of those three categories...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google’s approach to replacing the cookie is drawing anti... by MaxBarraclough on Wednesday February 03, 2021 @05:58PM (#26020348)

Sure, it's just a silly quip, I'm not saying it's watertight.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google’s approach to replacing the cookie is drawing anti... by sidibe on Wednesday February 03, 2021 @08:21PM (#26021448)

So being a small company?

[ Parent | on HN ]