Re:Sequencing your DNA with a USB dongle and open source code
by searine on Wednesday February 03, 2021 @08:46PM
(#26021618)
>it didn't turn out to be harder than I thought it was going to be.
Fair.
I've done my as well. Most of the "company" sites don't tell you much, which I think is a legal thing. They aren't cleared to release clinical predictions from genotypes, so they just... don't. I ended up running my through promethease (which mines SNPepedia) and found quite a bit more than what was reported.
I work with some certified clinical geneticists and yeah they do take a much closer look, but at the end of the day its all just sequencing and interpretation. I think its mostly just safeguards to keep bad actors at bay.
PGP looks interesting. I see that you submitted phenotype data. I didn't know they had a questionnaire with that. That's actually really interesting. I need to see what kind of questions they ask.
I had my genome sequenced a few years ago by Illumina. They had a big slick presentation, blah blah blah, ApoE1, etc. When the genetic counsellors came to my genome they said "huh. you don't have any risk factors". I checked and each of their risks was from an existing gene panel, so the WGS wasn't valuable (it's on PGP, if you want to work with it https://my.pgp-hms.org/profile/hu80855C).
I talked in more detail with the counsellors. Turns out, whenever they saw a novel variant that wasn't covered by a gene panel they were googling the variant and skimming the abstracts of papers.
It was at that point I realized the difference between research, PR, and actionable medical data.