Yeah that jumped out at me but it was probably a poorly phrased attempt at referring to the changes inherent in a unionized workplace. Like restrictions on how much work a person is allowed to do and conflict between employees who pay dues and employees who do not pay dues.

> It's impossible for me to imagine that anyone involved in drafting that text actually believed it was a meaningful argument.

You’re probably being hyperbolic but this lack of charity is one reason why we can’t have nice things.