Re:SpaceX SN9 Explodes on Landing
by ricardobeat on Tuesday February 02, 2021 @08:35PM
(#26009570)
Aren't solid boosters, like those used by the Shuttle, a simpler design than liquid engines?
On top of that, the Raptor engines used in the Starship, which seem to be considered state-of-the-art, are based on a soviet design from the 60s.
Re:SpaceX SN9 Explodes on Landing
by jjoonathan on Wednesday February 03, 2021 @09:56AM
(#26014098)
Raptors are state of the art. They are based on a soviet design from the 60s in the same way that they are based on US designs from the 60s.
It's weird that people seem so keen to talk up the soviet part and talk down the US part.
I think he is referring to the Soviet https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RD-270 full-flow staged combustion engine from the 60s.
The Americans had not been able to preserve the high-pressure hot oxygen from eating the preburner.
We can all see what happened: the soviets stopped spending money on innovation and tried to re-frame their stagnation as operational brilliance. Sure, Soyuz has a reliability niche, and I'd rather ride on it too, but I'd rather fund efforts to advance space exploration, even if they wind up being a clusterfuck like the shuttle.